Legislation Details

File #: 2025-01324    Version: 1
Type: Consent Item Status: Passed
File created: 6/20/2025 In control: City Council - 5PM
On agenda: 12/25/2025 Final action: 12/25/2025
Title: TEST FILE [Pass for Publication] Ordinance Listing 5850 Freeport Boulevard as a Landmark on the Sacramento Register of Historic and Cultural Resources (M24-014)
Title
TEST FILE [Pass for Publication] Ordinance Listing 5850 Freeport Boulevard as a Landmark on the Sacramento Register of Historic and Cultural Resources (M24-014)
End

FileID
File ID: 2025-01199
End

Location
Location: 5850 Freeport Blvd, APN: 035-0034-016-0000, District 5
End

Recommendation
Recommendation:1) Review an Ordinance listing 5850 Freeport Boulevard as a landmark on the Sacramento register of historic and cultural resources; and 2) pass for publication the ordinance title per Sacramento City Charter section 32(c) for City Council consideration on July 22, 2025.
End

Contact
Contact: Sean de Courcy, Preservation Director, (916) 808-2796, sdecourcy@cityofsacramento.org, Community Development Department
End

Presenter
Presenter: None
End

Attachments
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Ordinance
3-Historic Resource Evaluation for 5850 Freeport Boulevard [HF1]
4-Public Comments
End

Description/Analysis
IssueDetail
Issue Detail: In May 2024, Staff received a planning application requesting the demolition of the building at 5850 Freeport Boulevard due to interior fire damage. Consistent with City Code section 17.604.600, within 45 days of a request to demolish a building 50 years old or older, the preservation director is required to make a preliminary determination whether the building should be nominated for listing on the Sacramento register. The owner retained the services of SWCA environmental consultants who prepared and submitted a historic resources evaluation. Concurrently, the Sacramento County Historical Society retained Brunzell Historical to prepare a second historic resource evaluation for the building. The SWCA report recommended the building as ineligible as a historic landmark, while the Brunzell Historical report recommended the building as an eligible historic resource. The two reports and the request to demolish the building were routed to preservation advocacy and neighborhood groups; 61 comments were ...

Click here for full text