Title
Sacramento Community Police Review Commission Evaluation of Sacramento Police Department’s Implementation of 2020 Recommendations
End
FileID
File ID: 2024-01913
End
Location
Location: Citywide
End
Recommendation
Recommendation: Review and approve Evaluations of Sacramento Police Department (SPD)’s Implementation of 2020 Recommendations and pass a Motion forwarding to the City Council. Review and approve Evaluations of Sacramento Police Department (SPD)’s Implementation of 2020 Recommendations (“Evaluations”) and pass a Motion to submit the Evaluations to the Personnel and Public Employees Committee for consideration of forwarding to the City Council.
End
Contact
Contact: Keyan Bliss, Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission
End
Presenter
Presenter: Keyan Bliss, Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission
End
Attachments
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-2020 SCPRC Evaluations
End
Description/Analysis
IssueDetail
Issue Detail: The Sacramento Community Police Review Commission (SCPRC) was established in November 2016 (Ord. 2016-0055 § 2) with the purpose of providing community participation in reviewing and recommending police department policies, practices, and procedures; and monitoring the implementation, evaluation, and sustainability of city policing initiatives and programs (Sacramento City Code § 2.110.020).
At the beginning of 2021, the SCPRC provided 38 recommendations to the SPD relating to discipline & accountability (18), internal procedures for the SCPRC (11), and mental health (8). Each recommendation was accompanied with rationale which provided more specific information for each item.
SPD’s Office of the Chief, Professional Standards Unit was assigned responsibility to receive, analyze, research, update policies and procedures, and organize responses. In cases in which the SCPRC recommendation was not within the domain of SPD, applicable references to other appropriate city departments were noted. Each recommendation is accompanied with one of the following dispositions to both 2020 SCPRC recommendations:
● Approved and implemented (14)
● Approved and pending (2)
● Partial implementation (6)
● Pending further review (0)
● SPD unable to implement (14)
● Denied (1)
Following review and discussion between SPD and a subgroup of Commissioners, including the Chair and Vice Chair, each response is accompanied with an evaluation with one of the following dispositions for implementation of 2020 recommendations:
● Fully implemented (3)
● Partially implemented. (3)
● Started implementation (3)
● Not implemented (27)
● Pending further review (2)
End
PolicyConsiderations
Policy Considerations: None.
End
EconomicImpacts
Economic Impacts: Not Applicable.
End
EnvironmentalConsiderations
Environmental Considerations:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines §15378(b)(5)).
End
Sustainability
Sustainability: Not Applicable.
End
Commission/Committee Action
Commission/Committee Action: Not applicable.
End
RationaleforRecommendation
Rationale for Recommendation: Not applicable.
FinancialConsiderations
Financial Considerations: Not applicable.
End
LocalBusinessEnterprise
Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.
End