Legislation Details

File #: 2026-01673    Version: 1
Type: Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/31/2026 In control: Community Police Review Commission
On agenda: 9/14/2026 Final action:
Title: Sacramento County Grand Jury Report Discussion
Attachments: 1. 2026-01673 STAFF REPORT
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

Sacramento County Grand Jury Report Discussion

End

 

FileID

File ID: 2026-01673

End

 

Location

Location: Citywide

End

 

Recommendation

Recommendation: 1) Receive and discuss the 2025-2026 Sacramento County Grand Jury report, “Sacramento Community Police Review Commission: Window Dressing or Progressing?” (the “Report”) and; 2) provide related comments to the Chair and Vice Chair for submission to Council.

End

 

Contact

Contact: Jason Sample, Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission

End

 

Presenter

Presenter: Jason Sample, Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission

End

 

Attachments

Attachments:

1-Description/Analysis

2-Sacramento County Grand Jury Report

End

 

Description/Analysis

IssueDetail

Issue Detail: On June 25, 2026, the 2025-2026 Sacramento County Grand Jury released an investigative report titled “Sacramento Community Police Review Commission: Window Dressing or Progressing?” The report examined the effectiveness, support, visibility, recommendation process, and relationship of the Commission with City decision-makers and the Sacramento Police Department.

The Grand Jury's findings identified limited implementation or formal consideration of prior Commission recommendations and raised concerns regarding staffing, infrastructure, public visibility, recommendation tracking, and mechanisms for responses to Commission recommendations.

 

The Commission is not the body responsible for adopting the City's legally required formal response unless specifically designated by law or City direction. However, because the report directly concerns the Commission's work, the Commission may discuss the report and adopt comments for transmittal to the City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, Sacramento Police Department, or other appropriate City officials as they prepare or consider the City's response.

 

The Commission's comments should distinguish between: (1) factual corrections or clarifications; (2) areas of agreement; (3) areas where the Commission believes additional context is necessary; and (4) proposed actions that are within the Commission's authority versus actions that require City Council or administrative action.

End

 

PolicyConsiderations

Policy Considerations: The Sacramento Community Police Review Commission (SCPRC) was established to provide community participation in reviewing and recommending police department policies, practices, and procedures and to monitor the implementation, evaluation, and sustainability of City policing initiatives and programs. The Commission also advises and makes recommendations to the City Council regarding policing policies, procedures, and best practices.

End

 

EconomicImpacts

Economic Impacts: None.

End

 

EnvironmentalConsiderations

Environmental Considerations: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The proposed action is not a project under CEQA because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines §15378(b)(5).)

End

 

Sustainability

Sustainability: Not applicable.

End

 

Commission/CommitteeAction

Commission/Committee Action: The Commission has previously identified staffing support, recommendation tracking, public communication, onboarding, and improved annual reporting as organizational priorities. Final action on this item will be reflected in the meeting record.

End

 

RationaleforRecommendation

Rationale for recommendation: A formal Commission discussion and adopted set of comments will provide the City with the perspective of the body that is the subject of the Grand Jury report and will create a transparent public record of the Commission's position.

End

 

FinancialConsiderations

Financial Considerations: No direct fiscal impact is anticipated from adopting and transmitting Commission comments. Some Grand Jury recommendations or future City actions may have fiscal impacts that should be evaluated by the responsible City departments.

End

 

LocalBusinessEnterprise(LBE)

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

End