Legislation Details

File #: 2026-01789    Version: 1
Type: Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/21/2026 In control: Community Police Review Commission
On agenda: 10/5/2026 Final action:
Title: 2027 Work Plan Discussion and Development
Attachments: 1. 2026-01789 STAFF REPORT
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

2027 Work Plan Discussion and Development

End

 

FileID

File ID: 2026-01789

End

 

Location

Location: Citywide

End

 

Recommendation

Recommendation: 1) Discuss and develop the proposed 2027 SCPRC Work Plan, identify priority projects, intended outcomes, responsible leads, resource and feasibility considerations, anticipated timelines; and 2) provide direction on the desired approach for the preparation of the finalized work plan, including accepting Commissioner volunteers to work on its finalization, for review and approval by the Commission at its November 9, 2026 regular meeting.

End

 

Contact

Contact: Jason Sample, Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission

End

 

Presenter

Presenter: Jason Sample, Chair, and John Johnson, Vice Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission

End

 

Attachments

Attachments:

1-Description/Analysis

2-Draft 2027 Work Plan Framework

3-2026 Work Plan Status Summary

End

 

Description/Analysis

IssueDetail

Issue Detail: The 2027 Work Plan will define the Commission's proposed projects and priorities for the upcoming year. A focused and achievable plan should connect each project to the Commission's legal authority, identify the public purpose and intended outcome, account for available meeting capacity and staff support, and establish a realistic sequence for completion.

Commission discussion will consider unfinished 2026 work, community feedback, OPSA and SPD coordination, recommendation tracking, commissioner training, public access and outreach, annual Military Equipment Use engagement, and issues identified through the 2026 Annual Report. Potential topics include;

•                     Public awareness and accessible community participation;

•                     Budget discussion and information;

•                     Structured listening sessions and Military Equipment Use engagement;

•                     Regular SPD and OPSA information-sharing and data review;

•                     Policy-development, recommendation-tracking, and response protocols;

•                     Commissioner onboarding, training, and continuity; and

•                     Earlier annual-report drafting, measurable milestones, and public progress reporting.

End

 

PolicyConsiderations

Policy Considerations: Under Chapter 17 of the City Council Rules of Procedure, advisory bodies identify proposed projects, priorities, and recommendations for the upcoming year, including required resources and feasibility information. The Commission's work must remain within the authority established by Sacramento City Code Chapter 2.110.

End

 

EconomicImpacts

Economic Impacts: Not applicable.

End

 

EnvironmentalConsiderations

Environmental Considerations: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The proposed action is not a project under CEQA because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines §15378(b)(5).)

End

 

Sustainability

Sustainability: Not Applicable.

End

 

Commission/Committee Action

Commission/Committee Action: Not applicable.

End

 

RationaleforRecommendation

Rationale for Recommendation: None.

End

 

FinancialConsiderations

Financial Considerations: Work-plan development has no direct fiscal impact. The final plan should identify staffing, outreach, technology, training, translation, or other resource needs associated with proposed projects.

End

 

LocalBusinessEnterprise

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

End