Legislation Details

File #: 2026-00508    Version: 1
Type: Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/26/2026 In control: Animal Wellbeing Commission
On agenda: 4/15/2026 Final action:
Title: Amending Sacramento City Code Section 9.44.370 Relating to Number of Swine, Dogs, and Cats per Dwelling Unit
Attachments: 1. 2026-00508 Amending Sacramento City Code Section 9.44.370 Relating to Number of Swine, Dogs, and Cats per Dwelling Unit

Title

Amending Sacramento City Code Section 9.44.370 Relating to Number of Swine, Dogs, and Cats per Dwelling Unit

End

 

FileID

File ID: 2026-00508

End

 

Location

Location: Citywide

End

 

Recommendation

Recommendation: Review and pass a Motion to forward the amended ordinance to City Council for approval.

End

 

Contact

Contact: Ryan Hinderman, Communications and Customer Service Manager, (916) 808-7911, rhinderman@cityofsacramento.org, Community Development Department

End

 

Presenter

Presenter: Ryan Hinderman, Communications and Customer Service Manager, (916) 808-7911, rhinderman@cityofsacramento.org, Community Development Department

End

 

Attachments

Attachments:

1-Description/Analysis

2-Ordinance Amendment: Sacramento City Code 9.44.370 - Redline Version

3-Ordinance Amendment: Sacramento City Code 9.44.370

End

 

Description/Analysis

IssueDetail

Issue Detail: The Sacramento City Code currently regulates the number of certain animals that may be kept at a dwelling unit. This ordinance updates Section 9.44.370 to clarify and revise the allowable number of swine, dogs, and cats per residence (See attachments 2 and 3). The amendment establishes clear limits:

 

•                     A maximum of three permitted swine,

•                     A maximum of three dogs, unless all dogs are over four months old and spayed/neutered or qualifies for one of three exemptions allowed for in the ordinance amendment, in which case up to four dogs are allowed,

•                     A maximum of seven cats over eight weeks of age.

 

These updates ensure consistency with animal welfare practices, neighborhood compatibility, and enforcement clarity.

End

 

PolicyConsiderations

Policy Considerations: The proposed amendment aligns with the City’s goals of responsible pet ownership, reducing nuisance complaints, and promoting public health and safety. The revision also brings Code into alignment with current best practices in animal care and modernizes community standards.

End

 

EconomicImpacts

Economic Impacts: None. 

End

 

EnvironmentalConsiderations

Environmental Considerations: Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), approval of the proposed ordinance modifying the existing code that provides regulation for household pets will not result in a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the CEQA. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the common-sense exemption, CEQA applies only to actions with potential to significantly affect the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

 

Sustainability

Sustainability: Not applicable.

End

 

Commission/Committee Action

Commission/Committee Action: Animal Wellbeing Commission advised of the ordinance change as part of the 2025 Workplan. The proposed ordinance amendment was brought to the Law & Legislation Committee on January 13, 2026. The Committee passed a motion to bring the ordinance amendment to the Animal Wellbeing Commission and then to take the ordinance directly to City Council without returning to the Law & Legislation Committee.

End

 

RationaleforRecommendation

Rationale for Recommendation: The proposed amendment aligns with the City’s goals of responsible pet ownership, reducing nuisance complaints, and promoting public health and safety. The revision also brings Code into alignment with current best practices in animal care and modernizes community standards.

 

The Law and Legislation Committee requested that the Animal Wellbeing Commission review the proposed ordinance prior to sending it to City Council for final approval.

End

 

FinancialConsiderations

Financial Considerations:  Increasing the allowable number of owned animals per dwelling unit is expected to generate additional revenue through the City’s licensing fees.

End

 

LocalBusinessEnterprise

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

End