Legislation Details

File #: 2026-01792    Version: 1
Type: Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/21/2026 In control: Community Police Review Commission
On agenda: 10/5/2026 Final action:
Title: 2026 Annual Report Discussion and Recommendation
Attachments: 1. 2026-01792 STAFF REPORT
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

2026 Annual Report Discussion and Recommendation

End

 

FileID

File ID: 2026-01792

End

 

Location

Location: Citywide

End

 

Recommendation

Recommendation: 1) Review the draft 2026 Annual Report and discuss accomplishments, work-plan progress, resources, and proposed recommendations; 2) provide direction on revisions; and 3) recommend that the Annual Report Ad Hoc Committee return a revised report for Commission approval on November 9, 2026.

End

 

Contact

Contact: Jason Sample, Chair, Sacramento Community Police Review Commission

End

 

Presenter

Presenter: Jason Sample, Chair; John Johnson, Vice Chair; Sacramento Community Police Review Commission

End

 

Attachments

Attachments:

1-Description/Analysis

2-Draft 2026 SCPRC Annual Report

3-Annual Report Development Timeline

End

 

Description/Analysis

IssueDetail

Issue Detail: Chapter 17 of the City Council Rules of Procedure requires City advisory bodies to submit an annual report for review by P&PE. The report should identify accomplishments from the prior year's work and proposed projects, priorities, and recommendations for the upcoming year, including resource and feasibility considerations.

End

 

PolicyConsiderations

Policy Considerations: City Council Rules of Procedure Chapter 17 establishes the advisory-body annual-report process. Sacramento City Code section 2.110.030 also requires the Commission to report annually and make recommendations regarding Commission activities and SPD efforts to strengthen bias-free policing and community-police relations.

End

 

EconomicImpacts

Economic Impacts: None.

End

 

EnvironmentalConsiderations

Environmental Considerations: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The proposed action is not a project under CEQA because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines §15378(b)(5).)

End

 

Sustainability

Sustainability: Not applicable.

End

 

Commission/CommitteeAction

Commission/Committee Action: None.

End

 

RationaleforRecommendation

Rationale for recommendation: Establishing the annual-report timeline early supports timely compliance with Chapter 17, improves the quality of the report, and allows adequate time for public discussion and Commission review.

End

 

FinancialConsiderations

Financial Considerations: No direct fiscal impact is anticipated from establishing the report timeline. Staff-support costs associated with Commission meetings and report processing are part of normal Commission support unless otherwise identified.

End

 

LocalBusinessEnterprise(LBE)

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

End