Title
Public Hearing on Renewal of Midtown Property and Business Improvement District No. 2026-01 [Noticed 03/19/2026; Published 04/24/2026]
End
FileID
File ID: 2026-00906
End
Location
Location: District 4
End
Recommendation
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion, pass a Motion approving the proposed assessment and proposed activities and improvements for the Midtown Property and Business Improvement District (District) renewal, and directing the City Clerk to: a) tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn before the hearing is closed; and b) bring back this matter on May 12, 2026, with the tabulation results, for Council’s adoption of the District renewal.
End
Contact
Contact: Susanne Tam, Development Project Manager, (916) 808-7535, stam@cityofsacramento.org; Eric Frederick, Special Districts Manager, (916) 808-5129, efrederick@cityofsacramento.org; Department of Finance
End
Presenter
Presenter: Susanne Tam, Development Project Manager, (916) 808-7535, stam@cityofsacramento.org, Department of Finance
End
Attachments
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Schedule of Proceedings
3-District Map
4-Management District Plan
End
Description/Analysis
IssueDetail
Issue Detail: The Midtown Property and Business Improvement District (District) is a benefit assessment district intended to improve the Midtown Sacramento area and Alhambra Boulevard Corridor, as shown in the District map included as Attachment 3. The District was initially formed in 2007, and the current District term is set to expire on December 31, 2026. Property owners representing over 50% of the affected parcels within the District submitted petitions to the City requesting renewal of the District for a ten-year term that would run through December 31, 2036. The renewed District would provide improvements, activities, and services such as graffiti abatement, litter removal, streetscape maintenance, safety, events support, placement pilot projects, capital improvements, mobility, communications, and advocacy over and above those provided by the City.
On March 17, 2026, Council adopted a Resolution of Intention (Resolution No. 2026-0071),
directing the City Clerk’s Office to mail assessment ballots and notices of public hearing to the owners of real property within the proposed District and setting May 5, 2026, as the date for a public hearing on the proposed District and assessment. Public Hearing notices were mailed to all affected property owners on March 19, 2026.
At the conclusion of the hearing, staff recommends that Council approve the proposed assessment and proposed activities and improvements shown in the Management District Plan attached to this staff report as Attachment 4, and direct the City Clerk to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn to determine whether there is a majority protest against the assessment (i.e., a majority protest exists if the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in its favor, weighting those assessment ballots by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon the identified parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted). If there is no majority protest from ballots submitted and not withdrawn, staff will recommend that the Council adopt a resolution declaring the results of the ballot proceeding and renewing the District for a new ten-year term at the Council meeting on May 12, 2026.
End
PolicyConsiderations
Policy Considerations: The recommended actions in this report are in accordance with the California Property and Business Improvement District (PBID) Law of 1994 (California Streets and Highways Code section 36600 et seq.) and City Code Chapter 3.44.
End
EconomicImpacts
Economic Impacts: Not applicable.
End
EnvironmentalConsiderations
Environmental Considerations: Renewal of the District creates a funding mechanism for maintenance and other services and does not have a significant impact on the environment. Accordingly, renewal of the District does not in itself constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4).
End
Sustainability
Sustainability: Not applicable.
End
Commission/Committee Action
Commission/Committee Action: Not applicable.
End
RationaleforRecommendation
Rationale for Recommendation: The public hearing is a required step in the renewal process and its completion would allow the District renewal proceedings to continue. District improvements and activities would provide maintenance, safety, placemaking, capital improvements, mobility, advocacy, and communication services above what the City currently provides. This includes services such as graffiti abatement, litter removal, streetscape maintenance, safety, events support, placement pilot projects, capital improvements, mobility, communications, and advocacy services to attract visitors to assessed parcels.
The Midtown Association (MA), which is a nonprofit entity that serves as the governing body of the District, serves as a key partner to the City’s economic development efforts. In addition, MA has the potential to serve as a critical partner in identifying both business needs and opportunities, as it will in many instances be the first entity contacted by local businesses.
End
FinancialConsiderations
Financial Considerations: Financing is provided by the levy of assessments upon properties that benefit from District activities and improvements. There are 901 assessed parcels in the District service area. The total District assessment budget for the first year of the renewal term will be approximately $3,024,369. Approximately $3,779.59 in City and County administration fees will be deducted from the assessment amount dispersed to the District for the costs of City and County accounting and administration work. If the District is renewed, the City will continue to participate as a property owner. City-owned property will have a total first year annual assessment of approximately $92,962. Future increases in the District’s assessment rates are capped at 6% annually. Assessment payments for the City-owned properties would continue to be funded by the General Fund.
End
LocalBusinessEnterprise
Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.
End