Skip to main content
City of Sacramento header
File #: 2026-00690    Version: 1
Type: Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 2/26/2026 In control: Civil Service Board
On agenda: 3/16/2026 Final action:
Title: Appeal of the Disqualification of Reyes Ayon from the Senior Code Enforcement Officer Recruitment
Attachments: 1. 2026-00690 Appeal of the Disqualification of Reyes Ayon from the Senior Code Enforcement Officer Recruitment
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title
Appeal of the Disqualification of Reyes Ayon from the Senior Code Enforcement Officer Recruitment
End

FileID
File ID: 2026-00690
End

Location
Location: Citywide
End

Recommendation
Recommendation: Pass a Motion: 1) waiving formal rules for conducting the hearing pursuant to Civil Service Board Rule 4(11)(c)(7); and 2) adopting the Director's findings, determinations, and decision of disqualification in the appeal of Reyes Ayon for the Senior Code Enforcement Officer Recruitment pursuant to Civil Service Board Rule 4.11(c)(6).
End

Contact
Contact: Ambrosia Allen, Personnel Analyst, (916) 808-7065
alallen@cityofsacramento.org, Human Resources Department
End

Presenter
Presenter: None
End

Attachments
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Job Announcement
3-Applicant's Application
4-Notice of Disqualification
5-Appeal from Applicant
End

Description/Analysis
IssueDetail
Issue Detail:
BACKGROUND
A job announcement for Senior Code Enforcement Officer posted effective December 21, 2025 (Attachment 2). On January 3, 2026, Reyes Ayon submitted a timely application (Attachment 3) for the posting. On January 6, 2026, Appellant Ayon received a notice of disqualification (Attachment 4) stating they were not successful in the examination process.

ISSUE RAISED BY APPELLANT
On January 14, 2026, Appellant Ayon submitted an appeal response (Attachment 5) to the disqualification and cited Civil Service Board (CSB) Rule 4.10(c)(1): Erroneous interpretation or application of the qualification standards prescribed for the classification. Appellant Ayon's appeal states in part:

"The Training and Experience (T&E) Examination required applicants to self-select experience duration in several core competency areas, including conflict resolution, investigative work, public communication of complex regulations, evidence-related procedures, and staff guidance. I believe my responses did not fully reflect my cumulative and overlapping experience in...

Click here for full text