City of Sacramento header
File #: 2018-01771    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearing Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/20/2018 In control: City Council - 5PM
On agenda: 2/5/2019 Final action:
Title: Third Party Appeal: 601 Capitol Mall (P18-054) (Noticed on 01/25/2019)
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title:
Title
Third Party Appeal: 601 Capitol Mall (P18-054) (Noticed on 01/25/2019)
End

FileID
File ID: 2018-01771

Location
Location: 601 Capitol Mall, APN 006-0151-020, District 4

Recommendation:
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion adopt: 1) a Resolution exempting the project from CEQA (pursuant to Public Resources Code 21155.4); and 2) a Resolution approving a tentative map for condominium ownership, site plan and design review of an eight-story mixed-use building with deviations, and tree permit to remove a protected tree, thereby denying the third-party appeal.

Contact: Matthew Sites, Urban Design Staff, Associate AIA, LEED AP, (916) 808-7646; Karlo Felix, Senior Planner, (916) 808-7183; Bruce Monighan, AIA, Urban Design Manager, (916) 808-1241, Community Development Department

Body
Presenter: Matthew Sites, Urban Design Staff, Associate AIA, LEED AP, (916) 808-7646, Community Development Department

Applicant/Property Owner: Tim Johnson, Shorenstein Properties LLC, 235 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA 94101

Appellant: James Diel, 1023 E Street, Sacramento, CA 95811

Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Background Information
3-Resolution Exemption
4-Resolution Project Entitlements
5-P18-054 Plans
6-CC-2018-00309
7-Appeal Form
8-Staff Response
9-Public Comments


Description/Analysis

Issue Detail: The project site consists of a ?0.99 acre property currently developed with a surface parking lot and a small structure. The applicant is requesting approval to develop an eight-story, mixed-use building with ground-floor retail, residences, and parking.

On December 13, 2018, the Planning and Design Commission approved the tentative map, site plan and design review, and tree permit with a unanimous vote. Within the 10-day appeal period, a third-party appeal was filed. Staff has reviewed the third-party appeal (Attachment 7) and at the time of writing this report, the only objection raised by the appellant states...

Click here for full text